Plutocracy vs Democracy

You'll never believe which country gained the most wealth over the last decade

Currently, the US economy follows an austerity theory: 1% of the population will own over 50% of it’s wealth 

Plutocracy is…

government by the wealthy.
  • “The attack on the Bank of England was a gesture against the very symbol of plutocracy”
  • a country or society governed by the wealthy. plural noun: plutocracies
  • an elite or ruling class of people whose power derives from their wealth.  “officials were drawn from the new plutocracy”
Democracy is …
government by and for the people; affordability of free market entry fees for the common man.
“No one should accept public policies that turn a democracy into a plutocracy”

TAX CUTS

In the 1980s, the Reagan Administration sold plutocracy to America under the guise of “trickle-down economics.” This plan argues that tax breaks and benefits for corporations and the wealthy will trickle down to everyone else. If income, financial benefits, and capital gains from large corporations, investors, and entrepreneurs are free of taxes, they will stimulate economic growth. These individuals would pass on money to the middle and lower classes of society, through their investments and job creation. Thus, it was believed that those at the top would “trickle down” their newly acquired funds to others in society. Keynesian Economics no longer exists because governments do not invest in people.

The phrase Reagan tax cuts refers to changes to the United States federal tax code passed during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. There were two major tax cuts: The Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 and the Tax Reform Act of 1986. The tax cuts popularized the now-infamous phrase “Trickle-down economics” as it was primarily used as a moniker by opponents of the bill in order to degrade supply-side economics, the driving principle used to promote the tax cuts.

At the time, people weren’t substantially informed about the tax cuts, as an ABC News Poll in September 1986 showed that 63% of Americans didn’t know enough about the Tax Reform Act of 1986 to say if it was good or bad.

The homelessness crisis, by its very existence, gives the lie to this ideology [trickle-down economics]. It reveals that what actually trickles down is dislocation and deprivation,” Hanauer wrote. “Put simply, when you suppress the wages of low-income workers and disinvest from low-income housing, you’re going to have more homelessness.”

LOSS OF FREEDOM

When the rich set policy, Democracy is expensed. Greed is hyped; anti-trust laws are not enforced. On top of that, the jurisdictional system let the wealthy rise above the laws of the land. Communication platforms such as Facebook and Twitter influence the way we think with misinformation and body shaming.

The main operating software sold on PCs is MS Windows; the default search engine is Google.

GET RID OF AUSTERITY POLICIES

Capitalism is not distributed fairly and competition dwindles so that prices for goods and services are not regulated by the market; common people are discouraged from becoming entrepreneurs because capital is not obtainable or they fear the loss to maintain the household due to the lack of government intervention. For instance, the head of the household cannot afford the time to start a business because their family depends on them. 

Essentially, trickle-down doesn’t work because lower taxes on the wealthy doesn’t create more employment, consumer spending, or regained revenue. Income inequality has reached its highest point in 50 years, and money keeps accumulating at the top.


Government policy should never PROMOTE Plutocracy  because it incentivizes greed, monopolies, and unfair justice. Capitalism will expense Democracy!

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Leave a Reply